𝙱𝚊𝚌𝚔𝚙𝚊𝚌𝚔𝚎𝚛 𝙰𝚜𝚊𝚕 𝙼𝚊𝚍𝚒𝚞𝚗 𝙳𝚒𝚍𝚞𝚐𝚊 𝙺𝚊𝚋𝚞𝚛 𝚂𝚊𝚊𝚝 𝚃𝚞𝚛 𝚍𝚒 𝙺𝚘𝚛𝚎𝚊 P𝚒𝚑𝚊𝚔 T𝚛𝚊𝚟𝚎𝚕 Alami Kerugian Rp125 Jt

𝙸𝚗𝚒 𝚙𝚎𝚗𝚓𝚎𝚕𝚊𝚜𝚊𝚗 𝙳𝚛 𝚃𝚎𝚐𝚞𝚑 𝚂𝚞𝚑𝚊𝚛𝚝𝚘 𝚄𝚝𝚘𝚖𝚘 𝙿𝚊𝚔𝚊𝚛 𝙿𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚗𝚊 𝙸𝚗𝚍𝚘𝚗𝚎𝚜𝚒𝚊

𝙻𝚒𝚙𝚞𝚝𝚊𝚗 𝚒𝚗𝚍𝚘𝚗𝚎𝚜𝚒𝚊 || Surabaya - 𝚅𝚒𝚛𝚊𝚕𝚗𝚢𝚊 𝚔𝚊𝚜𝚞𝚜 𝚜𝚎𝚘𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚐 𝚙𝚎𝚜𝚎𝚛𝚝𝚊 𝚘𝚙𝚎𝚗 𝚝𝚛𝚒𝚙 𝚊𝚜𝚊𝚕 𝙼𝚊𝚍𝚒𝚞𝚗 𝚢𝚊𝚗𝚐 𝚍𝚒𝚍𝚞𝚐𝚊 𝚜𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚓𝚊 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚒𝚗𝚐𝚐𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚛𝚘𝚖𝚋𝚘𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚗 𝚠𝚒𝚜𝚊𝚝𝚊 𝚍𝚒 𝙺𝚘𝚛𝚎𝚊 𝚂𝚎𝚕𝚊𝚝𝚊𝚗 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚓𝚊𝚍𝚒 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚑𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚊𝚗 𝚙𝚞𝚋𝚕𝚒𝚔. 𝙱𝚎𝚛𝚍𝚊𝚜𝚊𝚛𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚔𝚎𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚗 𝚙𝚒𝚑𝚊𝚔 𝚙𝚎𝚗𝚢𝚎𝚕𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚐𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚓𝚊𝚕𝚊𝚗𝚊𝚗, 𝚙𝚎𝚜𝚎𝚛𝚝𝚊 𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚎𝚋𝚞𝚝 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚑𝚒𝚕𝚊𝚗𝚐 𝚙𝚊𝚍𝚊 𝚖𝚊𝚕𝚊𝚖 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚝𝚊𝚖𝚊 𝚜𝚎𝚝𝚎𝚕𝚊𝚑 𝚖𝚎𝚖𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚊 𝚒𝚣𝚒𝚗 𝚞𝚗𝚝𝚞𝚔 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚊𝚛𝚒 𝚜𝚎𝚙𝚊𝚝𝚞 𝚍𝚒 𝚔𝚊𝚠𝚊𝚜𝚊𝚗 𝙼𝚢𝚎𝚘𝚗𝚐𝚍𝚘𝚗𝚐 𝚍𝚊𝚗 𝚝𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚔 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚗𝚊𝚑 𝚔𝚎𝚖𝚋𝚊𝚕𝚒 𝚔𝚎 𝚑𝚘𝚝𝚎𝚕. 𝙰𝚔𝚒𝚋𝚊𝚝 𝚔𝚎𝚓𝚊𝚍𝚒𝚊𝚗 𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚎𝚋𝚞𝚝, 𝚙𝚒𝚑𝚊𝚔 𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚟𝚎𝚕 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚔𝚞 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚕𝚊𝚖𝚒 𝚔𝚎𝚛𝚞𝚐𝚒𝚊𝚗 𝚑𝚒𝚗𝚐𝚐𝚊 𝚜𝚎𝚔𝚒𝚝𝚊𝚛 𝚁𝚙125 𝚓𝚞𝚝𝚊 𝚊𝚔𝚒𝚋𝚊𝚝 𝚍𝚎𝚗𝚍𝚊 𝚍𝚊𝚗 𝚍𝚊𝚖𝚙𝚊𝚔 𝚊𝚍𝚖𝚒𝚗𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚏 𝚕𝚊𝚒𝚗𝚗𝚢𝚊.

𝙿𝚎𝚗𝚢𝚊𝚕𝚊𝚑𝚐𝚞𝚗𝚊𝚊𝚗 𝚅𝚒𝚜𝚊 𝚆𝚒𝚜𝚊𝚝𝚊 𝚓𝚎𝚕𝚊𝚜 𝙳𝚛 𝚃𝚎𝚐𝚞𝚑 𝚂𝚞𝚑𝚊𝚛𝚝𝚘 𝚄𝚝𝚘𝚖𝚘 𝙱𝚎𝚛𝚙𝚘𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚜𝚒 𝙼𝚎𝚕𝚊𝚗𝚐𝚐𝚊𝚛 𝙷𝚞𝚔𝚞𝚖 𝙽𝚎𝚐𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚃𝚞𝚓𝚞𝚊𝚗

𝙰𝚙𝚊𝚋𝚒𝚕𝚊 𝚋𝚎𝚗𝚊𝚛 𝚜𝚎𝚜𝚎𝚘𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚐 𝚖𝚊𝚜𝚞𝚔 𝚔𝚎 𝙺𝚘𝚛𝚎𝚊 𝚂𝚎𝚕𝚊𝚝𝚊𝚗 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚐𝚞𝚗𝚊𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚟𝚒𝚜𝚊 𝚔𝚞𝚗𝚓𝚞𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚗 𝚊𝚝𝚊𝚞 𝚟𝚒𝚜𝚊 𝚠𝚒𝚜𝚊𝚝𝚊, 𝚗𝚊𝚖𝚞𝚗 𝚜𝚎𝚓𝚊𝚔 𝚊𝚠𝚊𝚕 𝚖𝚎𝚖𝚒𝚕𝚒𝚔𝚒 𝚗𝚒𝚊𝚝 𝚞𝚗𝚝𝚞𝚔 𝚋𝚎𝚔𝚎𝚛𝚓𝚊 𝚜𝚎𝚌𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚒𝚕𝚎𝚐𝚊𝚕 𝚊𝚝𝚊𝚞 𝚜𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚓𝚊 𝚘𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚢, 𝚖𝚊𝚔𝚊 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚋𝚞𝚊𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚗𝚢𝚊 𝚍𝚊𝚙𝚊𝚝 𝚖𝚎𝚕𝚊𝚗𝚐𝚐𝚊𝚛 𝚑𝚞𝚔𝚞𝚖 𝚔𝚎𝚒𝚖𝚒𝚐𝚛𝚊𝚜𝚒𝚊𝚗 𝙺𝚘𝚛𝚎𝚊 𝚂𝚎𝚕𝚊𝚝𝚊𝚗. 𝙺𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚎𝚔𝚞𝚎𝚗𝚜𝚒𝚗𝚢𝚊 𝚍𝚊𝚙𝚊𝚝 𝚋𝚎𝚛𝚞𝚙𝚊 𝚍𝚎𝚙𝚘𝚛𝚝𝚊𝚜𝚒, 𝚙𝚎𝚗𝚊𝚑𝚊𝚗𝚊𝚗, 𝚕𝚊𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚗 𝚖𝚊𝚜𝚞𝚔 𝚔𝚎𝚖𝚋𝚊𝚕𝚒 (𝚋𝚕𝚊𝚌𝚔𝚕𝚒𝚜𝚝), 𝚑𝚒𝚗𝚐𝚐𝚊 𝚜𝚊𝚗𝚔𝚜𝚒 𝚕𝚊𝚒𝚗 𝚜𝚎𝚜𝚞𝚊𝚒 𝚑𝚞𝚔𝚞𝚖 𝙺𝚘𝚛𝚎𝚊 𝚂𝚎𝚕𝚊𝚝𝚊𝚗.

𝙿𝚎𝚛𝚋𝚞𝚊𝚝𝚊𝚗 𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚎𝚋𝚞𝚝 𝚓𝚞𝚐𝚊 𝚍𝚊𝚙𝚊𝚝 𝚖𝚎𝚛𝚞𝚐𝚒𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚌𝚒𝚝𝚛𝚊 𝚆𝚊𝚛𝚐𝚊 𝙽𝚎𝚐𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝙸𝚗𝚍𝚘𝚗𝚎𝚜𝚒𝚊 𝚍𝚊𝚗 𝚖𝚎𝚖𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚔𝚎𝚝𝚊𝚝 𝚙𝚎𝚖𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚔𝚜𝚊𝚊𝚗 𝚟𝚒𝚜𝚊 𝚋𝚊𝚐𝚒 𝚠𝚒𝚜𝚊𝚝𝚊𝚠𝚊𝚗 𝙸𝚗𝚍𝚘𝚗𝚎𝚜𝚒𝚊 𝚍𝚒 𝚖𝚊𝚜𝚊 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚍𝚊𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚐. 

𝙰𝚙𝚊𝚔𝚊𝚑 𝙳𝚊𝚙𝚊𝚝 𝙳𝚒𝚙𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚗𝚊 𝚍𝚒 𝙸𝚗𝚍𝚘𝚗𝚎𝚜𝚒𝚊?

𝙳𝚊𝚕𝚊𝚖 𝚑𝚞𝚔𝚞𝚖 𝙸𝚗𝚍𝚘𝚗𝚎𝚜𝚒𝚊, 𝚜𝚎𝚜𝚎𝚘𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚐 𝚝𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚔 𝚘𝚝𝚘𝚖𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚜 𝚍𝚊𝚙𝚊𝚝 𝚍𝚒𝚙𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚗𝚊 𝚑𝚊𝚗𝚢𝚊 𝚔𝚊𝚛𝚎𝚗𝚊 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚒𝚗𝚐𝚐𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚛𝚘𝚖𝚋𝚘𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚗 𝚠𝚒𝚜𝚊𝚝𝚊. 𝙽𝚊𝚖𝚞𝚗, 𝚊𝚙𝚊𝚋𝚒𝚕𝚊 𝚜𝚎𝚓𝚊𝚔 𝚊𝚠𝚊𝚕 𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚍𝚊𝚙𝚊𝚝 𝚝𝚒𝚙𝚞 𝚖𝚞𝚜𝚕𝚒𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚊𝚝𝚊𝚞 𝚒𝚍𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚝𝚊𝚜 𝚙𝚊𝚕𝚜𝚞 𝚞𝚗𝚝𝚞𝚔 𝚖𝚎𝚖𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚘𝚕𝚎𝚑 𝚏𝚊𝚜𝚒𝚕𝚒𝚝𝚊𝚜 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚓𝚊𝚕𝚊𝚗𝚊𝚗 𝚍𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚗 𝚝𝚞𝚓𝚞𝚊𝚗 𝚖𝚎𝚕𝚊𝚛𝚒𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚍𝚒𝚛𝚒, 𝚖𝚊𝚔𝚊 𝚍𝚊𝚙𝚊𝚝 𝚍𝚒𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚝𝚒𝚖𝚋𝚊𝚗𝚐𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚊𝚍𝚊𝚗𝚢𝚊 𝚞𝚗𝚜𝚞𝚛 𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚍𝚊𝚔 𝚙𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚗𝚊, 𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚕𝚊𝚒𝚗:

𝙿𝚊𝚜𝚊𝚕 378 𝙺𝚄𝙷𝙿 𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚐 𝙿𝚎𝚗𝚒𝚙𝚞𝚊𝚗, 𝚊𝚙𝚊𝚋𝚒𝚕𝚊 𝚜𝚎𝚓𝚊𝚔 𝚊𝚠𝚊𝚕 𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚍𝚊𝚙𝚊𝚝 𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚐𝚔𝚊𝚒𝚊𝚗 𝚔𝚎𝚋𝚘𝚑𝚘𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚗 𝚢𝚊𝚗𝚐 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚔𝚒𝚋𝚊𝚝𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚟𝚎𝚕 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚕𝚊𝚖𝚒 𝚔𝚎𝚛𝚞𝚐𝚒𝚊𝚗.

𝙰𝚙𝚊𝚋𝚒𝚕𝚊 𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚍𝚊𝚙𝚊𝚝 𝚙𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚐𝚞𝚗𝚊𝚊𝚗 𝚍𝚘𝚔𝚞𝚖𝚎𝚗 𝚙𝚊𝚕𝚜𝚞, 𝚍𝚊𝚙𝚊𝚝 𝚙𝚞𝚕𝚊 𝚍𝚒𝚔𝚎𝚗𝚊𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚔𝚎𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚞𝚊𝚗 𝚙𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚗𝚊 𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚔𝚊𝚒𝚝 𝚙𝚎𝚖𝚊𝚕𝚜𝚞𝚊𝚗 𝚍𝚘𝚔𝚞𝚖𝚎𝚗 𝚜𝚎𝚜𝚞𝚊𝚒 𝙺𝚄𝙷𝙿.

𝙿𝚎𝚗𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚙𝚊𝚗 𝚙𝚊𝚜𝚊𝚕 𝚙𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚗𝚊 𝚝𝚎𝚝𝚊𝚙 𝚑𝚊𝚛𝚞𝚜 𝚍𝚒𝚋𝚞𝚔𝚝𝚒𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚖𝚎𝚕𝚊𝚕𝚞𝚒 𝚙𝚎𝚗𝚢𝚒𝚍𝚒𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚍𝚊𝚗 𝚙𝚎𝚖𝚋𝚞𝚔𝚝𝚒𝚊𝚗 𝚍𝚒 𝚙𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚍𝚒𝚕𝚊𝚗.

𝚃𝚊𝚗𝚐𝚐𝚞𝚗𝚐 𝙹𝚊𝚠𝚊𝚋 𝙿𝚎𝚛𝚍𝚊𝚝𝚊 𝚔𝚎𝚙𝚊𝚍𝚊 𝚃𝚛𝚊𝚟𝚎𝚕

𝙳𝚊𝚛𝚒 𝚜𝚒𝚜𝚒 𝚑𝚞𝚔𝚞𝚖 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚍𝚊𝚝𝚊, 𝚊𝚙𝚊𝚋𝚒𝚕𝚊 𝚙𝚎𝚜𝚎𝚛𝚝𝚊 𝚝𝚎𝚕𝚊𝚑 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚊𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚗𝚒 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚓𝚊𝚗𝚓𝚒𝚊𝚗 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚓𝚊𝚕𝚊𝚗𝚊𝚗 (𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚟𝚎𝚕 𝚊𝚐𝚛𝚎𝚎𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝) 𝚢𝚊𝚗𝚐 𝚖𝚎𝚖𝚞𝚊𝚝 𝚔𝚎𝚠𝚊𝚓𝚒𝚋𝚊𝚗 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚒𝚔𝚞𝚝𝚒 𝚜𝚎𝚕𝚞𝚛𝚞𝚑 𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚐𝚔𝚊𝚒𝚊𝚗 𝚝𝚞𝚛, 𝚖𝚊𝚔𝚊 𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚍𝚊𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚒𝚗𝚐𝚐𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚛𝚘𝚖𝚋𝚘𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚗 𝚍𝚊𝚙𝚊𝚝 𝚍𝚒𝚔𝚊𝚝𝚎𝚐𝚘𝚛𝚒𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚜𝚎𝚋𝚊𝚐𝚊𝚒 𝚠𝚊𝚗𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚜𝚒 𝚋𝚎𝚛𝚍𝚊𝚜𝚊𝚛𝚔𝚊𝚗:

𝙿𝚊𝚜𝚊𝚕 1239 𝙺𝚄𝙷 𝙿𝚎𝚛𝚍𝚊𝚝𝚊, 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚎𝚗𝚊𝚒 𝚝𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚔 𝚍𝚒𝚙𝚎𝚗𝚞𝚑𝚒𝚗𝚢𝚊 𝚔𝚎𝚠𝚊𝚓𝚒𝚋𝚊𝚗 𝚍𝚊𝚕𝚊𝚖 𝚜𝚞𝚊𝚝𝚞 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚔𝚊𝚝𝚊𝚗.

𝙿𝚊𝚜𝚊𝚕 1243 𝙺𝚄𝙷 𝙿𝚎𝚛𝚍𝚊𝚝𝚊, 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚎𝚗𝚊𝚒 𝚔𝚎𝚠𝚊𝚓𝚒𝚋𝚊𝚗 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚐𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚒 𝚋𝚒𝚊𝚢𝚊, 𝚔𝚎𝚛𝚞𝚐𝚒𝚊𝚗, 𝚍𝚊𝚗 𝚋𝚞𝚗𝚐𝚊 𝚊𝚔𝚒𝚋𝚊𝚝 𝚠𝚊𝚗𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚜𝚒.

𝙱𝚊𝚑𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚊𝚙𝚊𝚋𝚒𝚕𝚊 𝚖𝚎𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚞𝚑𝚒 𝚞𝚗𝚜𝚞𝚛 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚋𝚞𝚊𝚝𝚊𝚗 𝚖𝚎𝚕𝚊𝚠𝚊𝚗 𝚑𝚞𝚔𝚞𝚖, 𝚍𝚊𝚙𝚊𝚝 𝚙𝚞𝚕𝚊 𝚍𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚜𝚊𝚛𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚙𝚊𝚍𝚊 𝙿𝚊𝚜𝚊𝚕 1365 𝙺𝚄𝙷 𝙿𝚎𝚛𝚍𝚊𝚝𝚊.

𝚃𝚛𝚊𝚟𝚎𝚕 𝚋𝚎𝚛𝚑𝚊𝚔 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚓𝚞𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚐𝚞𝚐𝚊𝚝𝚊𝚗 𝚐𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚒 𝚛𝚞𝚐𝚒 𝚜𝚎𝚙𝚊𝚗𝚓𝚊𝚗𝚐 𝚖𝚊𝚖𝚙𝚞 𝚖𝚎𝚖𝚋𝚞𝚔𝚝𝚒𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚊𝚍𝚊𝚗𝚢𝚊 𝚑𝚞𝚋𝚞𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚗 𝚜𝚎𝚋𝚊𝚋 𝚊𝚔𝚒𝚋𝚊𝚝 𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚍𝚊𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚙𝚎𝚜𝚎𝚛𝚝𝚊 𝚍𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚗 𝚔𝚎𝚛𝚞𝚐𝚒𝚊𝚗 𝚢𝚊𝚗𝚐 𝚍𝚒𝚊𝚕𝚊𝚖𝚒.

𝙰𝚙𝚊𝚔𝚊𝚑 𝙺𝚎𝚕𝚞𝚊𝚛𝚐𝚊 𝙸𝚔𝚞𝚝 𝙱𝚎𝚛𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚐𝚐𝚞𝚗𝚐 𝙹𝚊𝚠𝚊𝚋? 𝚃𝚎𝚐𝚞𝚑 𝚂𝚞𝚑𝚊𝚛𝚝𝚘 𝚄𝚝𝚘𝚖𝚘 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚎𝚐𝚊𝚜𝚔𝚊𝚗 "𝚂𝚎𝚌𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚑𝚞𝚔𝚞𝚖, 𝚔𝚎𝚕𝚞𝚊𝚛𝚐𝚊 𝚝𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚔 𝚘𝚝𝚘𝚖𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚜 𝚋𝚎𝚛𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚐𝚐𝚞𝚗𝚐 𝚓𝚊𝚠𝚊𝚋 𝚊𝚝𝚊𝚜 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚋𝚞𝚊𝚝𝚊𝚗 𝚊𝚗𝚐𝚐𝚘𝚝𝚊 𝚔𝚎𝚕𝚞𝚊𝚛𝚐𝚊𝚗𝚢𝚊 𝚢𝚊𝚗𝚐 𝚜𝚞𝚍𝚊𝚑 𝚍𝚎𝚠𝚊𝚜𝚊.

𝙽𝚊𝚖𝚞𝚗, 𝚔𝚎𝚕𝚞𝚊𝚛𝚐𝚊 𝚍𝚊𝚙𝚊𝚝 𝚍𝚒𝚖𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚒 𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚐𝚐𝚞𝚗𝚐 𝚓𝚊𝚠𝚊𝚋 𝚊𝚙𝚊𝚋𝚒𝚕𝚊:

𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚓𝚊𝚍𝚒 𝚙𝚎𝚗𝚓𝚊𝚖𝚒𝚗 (𝚐𝚞𝚊𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚘𝚛);

𝚒𝚔𝚞𝚝 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚊𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚗𝚒 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚓𝚊𝚗𝚓𝚒𝚊𝚗;

𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚖𝚊 𝚙𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚕𝚒𝚑𝚊𝚗 𝚑𝚊𝚔 𝚊𝚝𝚊𝚞 𝚑𝚊𝚛𝚝𝚊 𝚢𝚊𝚗𝚐 𝚋𝚎𝚛𝚊𝚜𝚊𝚕 𝚍𝚊𝚛𝚒 𝚠𝚊𝚗𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚜𝚒 𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚎𝚋𝚞𝚝; 𝚊𝚝𝚊𝚞

𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚋𝚞𝚔𝚝𝚒 𝚒𝚔𝚞𝚝 𝚖𝚎𝚖𝚋𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚞, 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚢𝚎𝚖𝚋𝚞𝚗𝚢𝚒𝚔𝚊𝚗, 𝚊𝚝𝚊𝚞 𝚋𝚎𝚔𝚎𝚛𝚓𝚊 𝚜𝚊𝚖𝚊 𝚍𝚊𝚕𝚊𝚖 𝚛𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚊𝚗𝚊 𝚙𝚎𝚕𝚊𝚛𝚒𝚊𝚗 𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚎𝚋𝚞𝚝. 𝚃𝚊𝚗𝚙𝚊 𝚊𝚍𝚊𝚗𝚢𝚊 𝚍𝚊𝚜𝚊𝚛 𝚑𝚞𝚔𝚞𝚖 𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚎𝚋𝚞𝚝, 𝚔𝚎𝚕𝚞𝚊𝚛𝚐𝚊 𝚝𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚔 𝚍𝚊𝚙𝚊𝚝 𝚍𝚒𝚖𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚒 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚐𝚐𝚞𝚗𝚐𝚓𝚊𝚠𝚊𝚋𝚊𝚗 𝚑𝚊𝚗𝚢𝚊 𝚔𝚊𝚛𝚎𝚗𝚊 𝚑𝚞𝚋𝚞𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚗 𝚍𝚊𝚛𝚊𝚑.

𝙿𝚎𝚗𝚞𝚝𝚞𝚙 𝙺𝚊𝚜𝚞𝚜 𝚒𝚗𝚒 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚓𝚊𝚍𝚒 𝚙𝚎𝚕𝚊𝚓𝚊𝚛𝚊𝚗 𝚋𝚊𝚑𝚠𝚊 𝚔𝚎𝚋𝚎𝚋𝚊𝚜𝚊𝚗 𝚋𝚎𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚐𝚒𝚊𝚗 𝚔𝚎 𝚕𝚞𝚊𝚛 𝚗𝚎𝚐𝚎𝚛𝚒 𝚑𝚊𝚛𝚞𝚜 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚎𝚛𝚝𝚊𝚒 𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚐𝚐𝚞𝚗𝚐 𝚓𝚊𝚠𝚊𝚋 𝚑𝚞𝚔𝚞𝚖. 𝚃𝚒𝚗𝚍𝚊𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚒𝚗𝚐𝚐𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚛𝚘𝚖𝚋𝚘𝚗𝚐𝚊𝚗 𝚠𝚒𝚜𝚊𝚝𝚊 𝚋𝚞𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚑𝚊𝚗𝚢𝚊 𝚖𝚎𝚛𝚞𝚐𝚒𝚔𝚊𝚗 𝚙𝚎𝚗𝚢𝚎𝚕𝚎𝚗𝚐𝚐𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚓𝚊𝚕𝚊𝚗𝚊𝚗 𝚜𝚎𝚌𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚏𝚒𝚗𝚊𝚗𝚜𝚒𝚊𝚕, 𝚝𝚎𝚝𝚊𝚙𝚒 𝚓𝚞𝚐𝚊 𝚍𝚊𝚙𝚊𝚝 𝚋𝚎𝚛𝚍𝚊𝚖𝚙𝚊𝚔 𝚙𝚊𝚍𝚊 𝚛𝚎𝚙𝚞𝚝𝚊𝚜𝚒 𝙸𝚗𝚍𝚘𝚗𝚎𝚜𝚒𝚊 𝚍𝚒 𝚖𝚊𝚝𝚊 𝚗𝚎𝚐𝚊𝚛𝚊 𝚕𝚊𝚒𝚗 𝚍𝚊𝚗 𝚖𝚎𝚖𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚞𝚕𝚒𝚝 𝚖𝚊𝚜𝚢𝚊𝚛𝚊𝚔𝚊𝚝 𝙸𝚗𝚍𝚘𝚗𝚎𝚜𝚒𝚊 𝚢𝚊𝚗𝚐 𝚒𝚗𝚐𝚒𝚗 𝚋𝚎𝚛𝚠𝚒𝚜𝚊𝚝𝚊 𝚖𝚎𝚕𝚊𝚕𝚞𝚒 𝚓𝚊𝚕𝚞𝚛 𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚖𝚒. 𝙰𝚙𝚊𝚋𝚒𝚕𝚊 𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚋𝚞𝚔𝚝𝚒 𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚍𝚊𝚙𝚊𝚝 𝚞𝚗𝚜𝚞𝚛 𝚙𝚎𝚗𝚒𝚙𝚞𝚊𝚗 𝚊𝚝𝚊𝚞 𝚠𝚊𝚗𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚜𝚒, 𝚙𝚒𝚑𝚊𝚔 𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚟𝚎𝚕 𝚖𝚎𝚖𝚒𝚕𝚒𝚔𝚒 𝚑𝚊𝚔 𝚞𝚗𝚝𝚞𝚔 𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚎𝚖𝚙𝚞𝚑 𝚞𝚙𝚊𝚢𝚊 𝚑𝚞𝚔𝚞𝚖 𝚙𝚒𝚍𝚊𝚗𝚊 𝚖𝚊𝚞𝚙𝚞𝚗 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚍𝚊𝚝𝚊 𝚜𝚎𝚜𝚞𝚊𝚒 𝚊𝚝𝚞𝚛𝚊𝚗. 

---

Penulis :𝚔𝚒𝚋

Baca juga:
"Berita Terbaru Lainnya"

_Dalam segala situasi, LiputanIndonesia.co.id berkomitmen memberikan fakta jernih dari TKP. Kirimkan Apresiasi Spesial untuk mendukung Jurnalisme._

---